The High Court rejected the applicant's bail application for offenses under Sections 454, 380, 411 IPC. The court found the applicant had violated prior bail conditions by committing two new offenses, indicating disrespect for court orders and poor antecedents.
None. Criminal application rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
43ba376.2024.odt
1
2024:BHC-NAG:9130
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (BA) NO. 376 OF 2024
Ravi Mohanlal Shribhate V/s State of Maharashtra
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order
Mr. I. Deshmukh, counsel for applicant. Mrs. H.N. Prabhu, APP for the non-applicant/State.
CORAM : URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J. DATED : 13/08/2024.
1 . The present application is preferred by the applicant for grant of bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, in connection with Crime No. 766/2022, registered at Police Station Pandharkawda, Tq. Kelapur, District Yavatmal, for the offences punishable under Sections 454, 380,411 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The applicant is arrested on 28/06/2023.
rkn
2 43ba376.2024.odt
a] The criminal application is rejected.
rkn
3
43ba376.2024.odt
[ URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.]
rkn
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to bail given he committed new offenses while on bail?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Ravi Mohanlal Shribhate
State of Maharashtra
Urmila Joshi-Phalke
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
