The applicant withdrew the bail application with liberty to apply after some time. The court allowed the withdrawal and disposed of the application.
The application was allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to apply after some time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AS:16839
Diksha Rane 904. BA 3662-23.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO.3662/2023
PRAVIN DHARMAJI PATIL ..APPLICANT VS.
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ..RESPONDENT
Adv. Amit Icham for the applicant. Mr. S. H. Yadav, APP for the State.
CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J.
DATE : APRIL 10, 2024.
P.C. :
1. Learned counsel for the applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw this application with liberty to apply after some time.
2. The application is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to apply after some time depending on the progress of the trial. The application is disposed of accordingly.
(M. S. KARNIK, J.)
1/1
Signed by: Diksha Rane Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 10/04/2024 18:17:00
Pravin Dharmaji Patil
The State of Maharashtra
M. S. KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
