Bail applicant sought withdrawal after the court expressed disinclination; application dismissed as withdrawn. Court directed expeditious commencement and conclusion of the trial, noting the applicant's youth and the victim's age.
Application permitted to be withdrawn and dismissed; direction for expeditious trial issued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
16-ba-360-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 360 OF 2024
Rajesh Kanojia ...Applicant vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
Mr. Aditya Sharma, a/w, Ms. Priya Maurya, for the Applicant. Mr. S. R. Agarkar, APP, for the Respondent-State.
Mr. Ranjit Agaste, for Respondent no. 2.
Mr. Prabhakar Joshi, API a/w, Sunil Meher PSI, V. B. Nagar Police Station.
CORAM : N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATE : 6th May, 2024
P.C.:
AMOL PREMNATH JADHAV
Digitally signed by AMOL PREMNATH JADHAV Date: 2024.05.08 10:55:35 +0530
APP.
13 years of age at the time of the alleged occurence. In these circumstances, it may be expedient to commence and conclude the trial as expeditiously as possible.
Amol
...1
16-ba-360-2024.doc
(N. J. JAMADAR, J.)
Amol
...2
Rajesh Kanojia
The State of Maharashtra
N. J. Jamadar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
