The Court dismissed the bail application, noting the applicant failed to approach the trial court as directed by a prior order allowing a fresh application if the trial exceeded six months. Liberty to file in the trial court was granted.
Bail application dismissed with liberty to file a fresh application before the trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
10-ba-3449-23.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3449 OF 2023
Gurudatta alias Baba Ashok Pande
...Applicant
Versus
State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
Mr.Hrishikesh Mundargi i/b Ms Swarali Joglekar for the Applicant.
Mr. S.V. Gavand, APP for the Respondent/State. PSI Imran Shaikh, Bhosari Police Station present.
CORAM : N. R. BORKAR, J. DATE : 20 JANUARY 2024.
PC:-
“Considering the fact that the applicant is in jail for about 3 ½ years, the trial court shall endeavour to conclude the trial as early as possible. If the trial is not concluded within a period of 6 months from the date of receipt of copy of this order, the applicant is at liberty to fle a fresh bail application before the trial Court. The application is disposed of in aforesaid terms.
(N.R. BORKAR, J.)
1/1
Dinesh S. Sherla
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a fresh bail application can be entertained given a prior order requiring trial within six months and liberty to approach the trial court.
Whether the applicant fulfills procedural obligations following a previous bail order.
Gurudatta alias Baba Ashok Pande
State of Maharashtra
N. R. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
