Bail Application was dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicant was unrepresented and the application remained non-circulated despite listing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(6)BA-294-2023.doc
rajshree
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO.294 OF 2023
Kamoli Kamal Sanni @ Seth Samuel Johnson] .. Applicant vs. Union of India & Anr. ] .. Respondents
None for the Applicant. Mr.Ashish Chavan for the Respondents. Ms.Mahalaxmi Ganpathy, APP for the State.
CORAM : BHARATI DANGRE, J
DATE : 19th April, 2024.
P.C.
The Bail Application being filed in the year 2023 is never circulated and even today when the Application is listed, none represent the Applicant, hence, it is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Digitally signed by RAJSHREE RAJSHREE KISHOR KISHOR MORE MORE Date: 2024.04.20 10:57:43 +0530
[BHARATI DANGRE, J]
1/1
Kamoli Kamal Sanni @ Seth Samuel Johnson
Union of India & Anr.
Bharati Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
