The Single Judge disposed of the second bail application as withdrawn by the applicant, noting the long delay in trial proceedings despite the case being listed for production and charges being framed.
The bail application was disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
MANDIRA MILINDSALGAONKAR Digitally signed by MANDIRAMILIND SALGAONKARDate: 2024.02.22 16:40:16+0530
1/2 1 BA-2851-23.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.2851 OF 2023
Mohammed Gulfam Mohammed Ajaz .. Applicant Khan
Versus
The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
Mr.Tohid Shaikh i/b Ms.Anjali Patil for the Applicant. Smt.Mahalaxmi Ganpati, A.P.P. for the State/Respondent.
CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE, J. DATED : 21st FEBRUARY, 2024
P.C:-
On expressingc that there is no changce in the circumstance for the second application beingc entertained, the learned counsel for the Applicant seeks permission to withdraw the same.
M.M.Salgcaonkar
2/2 1 BA-2851-23.odt
to note from 07/09/2021 till 10/10/2023, the case was fxed for appearance. It is only on 01/11/2023, the case is listed under caption, ‘production of Accused’ and on 29/11/2023, the chargce is framed.
Consideringc the longc incarceration of the Applicant, it is expected that the Special Judgce shall not only fll the roznama, with no progcress in the trial. Now, the chargce havingc been framed, it is expected that the Special Judgce shall proceed with the trial.
( SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.)
M.M.Salgcaonkar
Mohammed Gulfam Mohammed Ajaz Khan
The State of Maharashtra
Bharati Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
