Dadaram Aktar Bhosale v. State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Two applicants charged with kidnapping for ransom and other serious offences applied for bail. The High Court allowed bail, dismissing the State's opposition regarding absconding co-accused, emphasizing the investigation was complete and chargesheet filed. Stringent conditions were imposed including sureties, passport surrender, and travel restrictions.
What did the court decide?
Applicants released on bail with P.R. Bonds of Rs.50,000/- each, one or more local sureties in like amount, stringent reporting conditions, travel restriction within Dhule District, and passport surre
What the court decided
2024:BHC-AS:15821
Diksha Rane 906 BA 27524.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO.275/2024
DADARAM AKTAR BHOSALE ..APPLICANT VS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ..RESPONDENT
WITH BAIL APPLICATION NO.276/2024
BABLU ALIAS BATTA CHOTU CHAVHAN ..APPLICANT VS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ..RESPONDENT
Adv. Sanjeev B. Deore a/w. Adv. Jitendra K. Pagare, Adv. Suchia J. Pawar, Adv. Navin Singh for the applicants. Mr. S. A. Karmakar, APP for the State in BA/275/24. Mr. Swapnil V. Walve, APP for the State in BA/276/24. PSI Ajinath Narayan Kothale, Malegaon Taluka, Nashik.
CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J.
DATE : APRIL 3, 2024.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to accused persons charged with serious offences like kidnapping for ransom when co-accused are absconding.
Whether the passage of more than a year in custody without trial conclusion is a ground to grant bail.
What stringent conditions must be imposed on accused persons to permit bail release.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
DADARAM AKTAR BHOSALE
- applicant
BABLU ALIAS BATTA CHOTU CHAVHAN
- respondent
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court