Allowed

Jameer Bandenawaj Mujawar and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC19 Sept 2024BA/2674/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court allowed bail to applicants facing multiple charges including IPC 353, 323, 304 (implied by 143/149 context) and Maharashtra Police Act 135. Court noted applicants were in jail for 7 months with no overt acts attributed to them post-charge sheet.

What did the court decide?

Applicants released on bail by furnishing P.R. Bond of Rupees Twenty-Five Thousand with one solvent surety.

Jameer Bandenawaj Mujawar and Anr. Vs State of Maharashtra — Bail and Remand | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

14-ba-2674-2024.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶3

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.2674 OF 2024

¶5

Jameer bandenawaj Mujawar and ... Applicants Anr.

¶6

V/s.

¶7

State of Maharashtra … Respondent

¶8

Mr. Ujwal Agandsurve, for the applicant. Mr. P.H. Gaikwad, APP, for the Respondent / State.

¶9

VARSHA DEEPAK GAIKWAD

¶10

Digitally signed byVARSHA DEEPAK GAIKWAD Date: 2024.09.20 14:24:09 +0530

¶11

Mr. Basavraj Koshti, Mangalvedha Police Station, Present.

¶12

CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR, J.

¶13

DATE : 19^TH SEPTEMBER, 2024.

¶14

PC:

¶15

Heard.

¶16

By this application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure the applicants are seeking bail in Crime No.99 of 2024, registered with Mangalwedha Police Station, Solapur, for the offences punishable under Sections 353, 332, 333, 323, 324, 504, 143, 147, 148, 149 of the Indian Penal Code and section 135 of the Maharashtra Police Act.

¶17

Having gone through the charge-sheet and the material collected by the IO during the investigation, prima facie except the presence of the applicants no overt act on the part of the applicants is attributed to

1 of 3

varsha

14-ba-2674-2024.doc

them.

Considering the said fact and the fact that the applicants are in jail from last 7 months and during the same period the charge-sheet has been filed, I am of the opinion that further custody of the applicants are not required.

¶23

In the circumstances, though the learned APP is strongly opposing the application, I pass the following order:

¶24

ORDER

¶25

(i) Criminal Bail Application is allowed and disposed of;

¶26

(ii) It is directed that the applicants shall be released on bail in Crime No.99 of 2024, registered with Mangalwedha Police Station, Solapur, for the offences punishable under Sections 353, 332, 333, 323, 324, 504, 143, 147, 148, 149 of the Indian Penal Code and section 135 of the Maharashtra Police Act, on furnishing P.R.Bond of Rupees Twenty-Five Thousand with one solvent surety in the like amount;

¶27

iii) The applicants shall attend the said Police Station on 1st day of each month between 10.00a.m. to 11.00 a.m., till the conclusion of the trial except on the date of trial;

¶28

v) The applicants shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case, as also not tamper with the evidence;

¶29

vi) Liberty is granted to the State to apply for

2 of 3

varsha

14-ba-2674-2024.doc

cancellation of bail in case of any breach of condition if the applicant commenced similar offence;

¶34

vii) The applicants shall attend the trial before the trial Court regularly on every date unless exemption is granted by the trial Court.

¶35

(ANIL S. KILOR, J)

¶36

3 of 3

¶37

varsha

Jameer Bandenawaj Mujawar and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jameer Bandenawaj Mujawar and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gajanan Mallikarjun Birajdar vs State of Maharashtra

Mouiaali Shoukat Mulla vs the State of Maharashtra

Shadab Hanif Patel vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Harishchandra Mahadev Jadhav vs the State of Maharashtra

Akash Chandrakant Matekar Vs State of Maharashtra

Sanket Sunil Nakarde Vs State of Maharashtra