In a bail application, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the applicant had already secured bail from the Sessions Court. Consequently, the High Court held that no further consideration was required.
The bail application was disposed of as nothing survived for further consideration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by RUSHIKESH RUSHIKESH VISHNU VISHNU PATIL PATIL Date: 2024.03.28 12:59:02 +0530
4 BA.239.2023.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 239 OF 2023
Dinesh Bankelal Gaud... Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and Anr....Respondents
*****
None for the Applicant.
Mr. R. M. Pethe, APP, for the Respondent – State (Through V.C.).
Ms Vidya N. Mane, PSI, Chitalsar Police Station, Thane City, present.
*****
CORAM : MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J.
DATE : 26th MARCH 2024
P.C.:
1. None for the Applicant.
2.Learned APP submits that the applicant has already been granted
bail by the Sessions Court by order dated 29th September 2023. In view
of the same, nothing survives for further consideration in the present
application. Accordingly, the Application is disposed of.
[MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J.]
1/1
R.V.Patil
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present bail application requires consideration when the applicant has already been granted bail by the Sessions Court.
Dinesh Bankelal Gaud
The State of Maharashtra and Anr.
MANJUSHA DESHPANDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court