The High Court at Aurangabad allowed the withdrawal of a bail application pending in a trial delayed since 2019, as the prosecution had closed its case. The applicant was discharged.
Leave granted to withdraw the bail application; application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:17972
923-ba-220-2024.odt
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 220 OF 2024
Bhavdu @ Tingrya @ Dinesh Ramesh Pawar VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Another
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Chatterji Joydeep APP for Respondent/State : Ms. P.V. Diggikar Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. Bhushan Mahajan (appointed)
CORAM : S.G. MEHARE, J.
DATED : AUGUST 13, 2024
PER COURT:-
lead the evidence. Hence, her evidence was dropped long back. However, thereafter there was no progress in the trial. Hence, the applicant was seeking bail. The learned APP was asked to make a statement how many witnesses are to be examined. She, on instructions of the Additional District Government Pleader, Dhule states that today the prosecution has closed its side. In the circumstances, it may be believed that the trial may be concluded within a short time.
923-ba-220-2024.odt
(2)
opportunities to protract the trial and make endeavour to dispose of the trial at the earliest.
Mujaheed//
Bhavdu @ Tingrya @ Dinesh Ramesh Pawar
The State Of Maharashtra
S.G. MEHARE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
