Gullu Fakku Ninamma and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Two bail applications filed by accused persons under the MCOC Act were disposed of as infructuous because they had been acquitted by a Special Court on 31.01.2024.
Two bail applications filed by accused persons under the MCOC Act were disposed of as infructuous because they had been acquitted by a Special Court on 31.01.2024.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 248 OF 2023
Prakash Gendiya Damor
.Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
.Respondent
WITH
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 218 OF 2023
Gullu Fakku Ninamma and anr.
.Applicants
Versus
The State of Maharashtra.Respondent
None for the Applicants.
Ms. Veera Shinde, APP, for the Respondent – State.
CORAM:MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
DATE :04.03.2024
P. C.
1. Ms. Shinde, learned APP states that the Accused have been
acquitted by Judgment dated 31.01.2024 by a learned Special Judge
under the MCOC Act, Pune in Spl. MCOCA Case No. 11 of 2016.
2. Accordingly, the Bail Applications are disposed of, as same have
become infructuous.
[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]
Page No. 1
Anand
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Prakash Gendiya Damor
The State of Maharashtra
Madhav J. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court