Bail application in a murder case involving a money dispute; the court, noting direct evidence and postmortem injuries showing the offence's gravity, declined bail. The applicant withdrew the application with liberty to reapply if trial is not completed within a year.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ba198.24.O.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (BA) NO.198 OF 2024
(Prakash @ Pakya s/o Bhim Kosare Vs. The State of Maharashtra thr. PSO PS Wathoda, Dist. Nagpur)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar’s Orders.
Mr. P. Maliya, Advocate for Applicant.
Ms. Shamsi Haider, APP for Non-Applicant/State.
CORAM: URMILA JOSHI PHALKE, J. DATE: 18th APRIL, 20 24.
After going through the investigation papers and after hearing the learned counsel for the applicant to some extent, it reveals that the deceased was eliminated due to the dispute over the money transaction direct evidence and the injury sustained and noted in the postmortem report shows the gravity of the offence. Therefore, I have shown my disinclination to grant bail.
JUDGE
NSN
Prakash @ Pakya s/o Bhim Kosare
The State of Maharashtra thr. PSO PS Wathoda, Dist. Nagpur
Urmila Joshi Phalke
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
