Rahul Dashrathlal Sharma v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Application dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
07-BA-1835-2022.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1835 OF 2022
Rahul Dashrathlal Sharma…
Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and Anr.…
Respondents
None for the Applicant.
Ms. Rashmi S. Tendulkar, APP, for the Respondent-State.
Mr. N. B. Chavan, PSI, ANC, Azad Maidan Unit, present.
CORAM : PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.
DATED : 19th MARCH, 2024.
P.C.
None for the applicant.
2 Application stands dismissed for want of prosecution. [PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.]
REKHA PRAKASH PATIL
Digitally signed by REKHA PRAKASH PATIL Date: 2024.03.20 11:23:08 +0530
1 of 1
Rekha Patil
RAHUL DASHRATHLAL SHARMA
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court