Bail application before the High Court rendered infructuous because the applicant had already been enlarged on bail by the Sessions Court; application disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
6.BA.1612.2023.doc
HARSHADA H. SAWANT (P.A.)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.1612 OF 2023
Lalit Vasant Wagh Applicant / .. Accused
Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. Respondents/ .. Org. Complainant.
CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : APRIL 15, 2024
P.C.:
1. None for the Applicant.
2. Heard Mr. Shalgaonkar, APP for Respondent No.1 – State.
3. Mr. Shalgaonkar, learned APP informs the Court that by order dated 25.07.2023 passed below Exhibit-14 in Special Case No.254 of 2023, the Applicant has been enlarged on bail by the learned Sessions Court on terms and conditions.
4. In that view of the matter, none is appearing for the Applicant.
5. However, in view of the above order the present Bail Application has therefore become infructuous.
6. Mr. Shalgaonkar is directed to place on record a copy of
1 of 2
6.BA.1612.2023.doc
order dated 25.07.2023 in course of the day.
7. In view of the above, Bail Application No.1612 of 2023 is
disposed of as infructuous.
H. H. SAWANT
[ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]
Digitally signed HARSHADAHANUMANT by HARSHADAHANUMANTSAWANT SAWANT Date: 2024.04.15 15:53:19 +0530
2 of 2
Lalit Vasant Wagh
The State of Maharashtra
Milind N. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
