Bail application under Section 439 CrPC; court expressed disinclination to grant bail, and the applicant sought permission to withdraw the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 / 1 33.ba160.2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (BA) NO. 160 OF 2024
Pravin s/o Moreshwar Sahare
Vs.
State of Maharashtra, Thru. PSO, PS Sadar, Nagpur
Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Court's or Judge's Orders.
Mrs. Meena Hiwase, Advocate for applicant. Mr. A.G. Mate, APP for non-applicant/State.
CORAM : SMT. URMILA JOSHI PHALKE, J. DATE : 24.07.2024
This is an application for bail. After hearing the learned counsel for the applicant to some extent and after going through the investigation papers, I have shown my disinclination to grant bail.
(SMT. URMILA JOSHI PHALKE, J)
Prity
Pravin s/o Moreshwar Sahare
State of Maharashtra, Thru. PSO, PS Sadar, Nagpur
Urmila Joshi Phalke
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
