The applicant sought leave to withdraw the bail application. The Court allowed the withdrawal but directed the trial to be concluded within one year, failing which the applicant could renew the bail plea.
Application withdrawn; liberty to renew bail if trial not concluded within one year.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
43-ba-1590-2023.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO.1590 OF 2023
VISHAL SUBHASH PAREKAR
Digitally signed by VISHAL SUBHASH PAREKAR Date: 2024.01.06 11:25:39 +0530
Mohd. Jamal Mohd. Raees Khan ...Applicant vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
Mr Amit Munde, for the Applicant. Mr. Y.M. Nakhwa, APP, for the Respondent/State. Mr. Abhishek Nampalle, API, Shil-Daighar police station.
CORAM : N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATE : JANUARY 05, 2024
P.C.:
Vishal Parekar
...1
43-ba-1590-2023.doc
Application disposed.
Vishal Parekar
...2
1 issue framed by the court
Should the bail application be allowed given the applicant's pre-trial detention?
VISHAL SUBHASH PAREKAR
The State of Maharashtra
N. J. JAMADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
