The High Court Bench at Aurangabad, while expressing disinclination to grant bail, allowed the applicant to withdraw the bail application, leading to its dismissal.
Leave granted to withdraw the bail application; application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:23399
921-BA-1279-24.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1279 OF 2024
IMRAN @ IMMU HUSSAIN BHISTI VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Rupesh Anil Jaiswal APP for Respondent : Mr. S. B. Pulkundwar
CORAM : S. G. MEHARE, J. DATE : 01-10-2024
PER COURT :-
the learned A.P.P. for the respondent, the Court expressed disinclination to grant bail. The learned counsel for the applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the application. Leave granted.
( S. G. MEHARE ) JUDGE
rrd
IMRAN @ IMMU HUSSAIN BHISTI
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
S. G. MEHARE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
