Bail application by the applicant; the State sought time to file its reply. The court adjourned the matter to after the Christmas vacation and passed no substantive order.
Adjournment order only. Bail application listed after Christmas vacation; State's counsel waived notice and sought time to file reply. No bail decided, no proposition of law laid down.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
10ba1246.2024.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (BA) NO.1246 OF 2024
Mangesh Pilaji Shivankar Vs State Of Maharashtra
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order
Mr. M.R. Khan, counsel for applicant.
Mr. Ganesh Umale, APP for non-applicant/State.
CORAM : URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J. DATED : 20/12/2024.
non-applicant/State and seeks time to file reply.
[ URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.]
Signed by: Mr. R.K. NANDURKAR rkn Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 21/12/2024 14:45:34
Mangesh Pilaji Shivankar
State of Maharashtra
Urmila Joshi-Phalke
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
