was his neighbour and then the dead body as well as the car was set on fire. He submitted that even the said car was also insured. He pointed out Recovery Panchnama of wooden stump as well as of the shoes, T-shirt and jeans trousers recovered at the instance of the Accused No.1. He pointed out the post-mortem examination report at page no.103 and submitted that the injuries recorded are head injuries as well as burn injuries. He also pointed out the statement of Tanaji Ramchandra Satre (Page-141), Alankar Suresh Jagtap (Page-142), Pravin Subhash Suryawanshi (Page-143), Santosh Laxman Kashid (Page-144), Nizamuddin Hasan Shaikh (Page-145), Rohidas Ankush Chavan (Page-147), Nanaso Shivaji Katte (Page-151), and Sushil Shivaji More (Page-157). He submitted that although the case is of circumstantial evidence, there are very strong circumstances against the Applicant. He submitted that the offence in question was committed with complete premeditation. It is not a case of a crime being committed without premeditation or on the spur of the moment. He submitted that the circumstances against the present Applicant are incriminating circumstances and that parity will not apply to the present Applicant on the basis of the Order of learned Single Judge (Coram:V. G. Bisht, J.) dated 15th November 2021. He
