Disposed

Pramod Baburao Shelke v. Customs Department , Narcotic Cell and Anr.

Bombay HC1 Feb 2024BA/1197/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application filed by the Applicant, who was arrested carrying about 868 kg of Ganja, the Single Judge directed the Trial Court to conclude the trial within one year and granted liberty to file a fresh bail application after eight months if trial progress is inadequate.

What did the court decide?

The Trial Court is directed to conclude the trial within one year. Liberty granted to file fresh bail after eight months if no substantial progress is made.

Pramod Baburao Shelke Vs Customs Department , Narcotic Cell… — Narcotics (NDPS) | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

934-BA-1197-2023.doc Arjun

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

BAIL APPLICATION NO.1197 OF 2023

¶4

Pramod Baburao Shelke …Applicant Versus The Customs Department, Narcotic Cell, …Respondents Pune & Anr.

¶5

Mr. Mithilesh Mishra i/b Gopal Bhosale, for the Applicant. Mr. Amit Munde, SPP, for Respondent No.1-Customs Department, Narcotic Cell (Pune).

¶6

Ms. Veera Shinde, APP, for the Respondent-State.

¶7

CORAM : MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATED : FEBRUARY 01, 2024

¶8

P.C.:

¶9

1. Heard Mr. Mishra, learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant.

¶10

2. At the outset, he pointed out the Order dated 30th March 2023 passed by learned Single Judge [Coram: N. R. Borkar, J] in Bail Application No.2628 of 2022 filed by two co-accused. The said Order reads as under:

¶11

"1. Considering the fact that the applicants are in jail for more than two years and as there are no other criminal antecedents, the trial Court shall endeavour to conclude the trial, as early as possible. In case, the trial is not concluded within a period of six months from the date of receipt of copy of this order, the applicants are at liberty to file fresh application for bail.

¶12

¶13

934-BA-1197-2023.doc Arjun

¶14

The Bail Application is disposed of in the aforesaid terms."

¶15

3. He further submits that although the above Order is passed on 30th March 2023, till date, there is no progress in the trial.

¶16

4. Mr. Munde, learned SPP appearing for Respondent No.1Customs states that one co-accused is enlarged on bail and there is delay in conducting trial as he files either exemption Application or adjournment Application and, therefore there is no progress in the trial.

¶17

5. The factual position on record shows that the Applicant was apprehended from the truck which was carrying about 868 kg Ganja.

¶18

6. Mr. Mishra, learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant has raised certain contentions, however, the bail Application filed by co-accused has already been disposed of in above terms.

¶19

7. The learned Trial Court is requested to conclude the trial within a period of one year from today.

¶20

8. The Applicant is granted liberty to file a fresh bail Application after a period of eight months if there is no substantial progress in the trial.

¶21

9. Accordingly, the Bail Application is disposed of.

¶22

[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]

¶23

Pramod Baburao Shelke v. Customs Department , Narcotic Cell and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pramod Baburao Shelke v. Customs Department , Narcotic Cell and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pramodkumar Kuberram Jeshawar Vs State of Maharashtra

Shivram Narayan Salavi Vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Rex Brian Ohara Vs the State of Maharashtra

Shubham Ashok Shendage vs State of Maharashtra

Owais Julkarnen Johar Sharif Sayyad @Rahul Mehra Vs State of Maharashtra

Manthan Arjun Dhulap Vs State of Maharashtra