Allowed

Anis Nais Mohammad v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Bombay HC18 Jan 2024BA/114/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application withdrawn by the applicant who is behind bar since 2019. The court directed the trial court to conclude the trial expeditiously within eight months and allowed withdrawal with liberty to file a fresh application if there is no substantial progress.

What did the court decide?

Bail application allowed to be withdrawn; trial expedited with 8-month timeline.

Anis Nais Mohammad Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr. — Bail and Remand | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

2024:BHC-AS:2369

¶2

902-BA-114-2024.doc
Sonali

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 114 OF 2024

¶5

Anis Nais Mohammad ...Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents

¶6

Mr. Sushant J. Tayade a/w. Mr. Tejas K. Kamble and Ms. Pradnya K.
Kamble, Advocates for the Applicant.

¶7

Ms. Veera Shinde, APP for the Respondent-State.
Mr. Ganesh Torgal, API, Kondhwa Police Station, Pune present.

¶8

CORAM : MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATED : 18^th JANUARY 2024

¶9

P. C.

¶10

1. Heard Mr. Tayade, learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant

¶11

and Ms. Shinde, learned APP appearing for the Respondent-State.

¶12

2. Mr. Tayade, learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant after

¶13

arguing the matter for some time states that he has instructions to
withdraw the Bail Application. He further states that the trial be

¶14

expedited as the Applicant is behind bar since 17th September 2019.

¶15

3. Ms. Shinde, learned APP states that charge is already framed.

¶16

She further states that the State will take steps to conclude the trial
expeditiously.

¶17

1/2

¶18

902-BA-114-2024.doc
Sonali

¶19

4. Accordingly, the learned Trial Court is requested to expeditiously conclude the trial and preferably within a period of 8 months from the date of passing of this order.

¶20

5. The Applicant is at liberty to file a fresh Bail Application after a period of 8 months, in case, there is no substantial progress in the trial.

¶21

6. The Bail Application is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed off as such with liberty as aforesaid.

¶22

[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]

¶23

2/2

Anis Nais Mohammad v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anis Nais Mohammad v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sebastian Walathuparambil and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra

Prsahant Shrimant Nalavade and Anr. Vs State of Maharashtra

Pravin Hanumantrao Joshi and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Vitthal Keshav More Vs State of Maharashtra

Sujit Rajaram Shinde Vs State of Maharashtra

Mrs. X vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.