Bail application under IPC Sections 376(2)(n), 376(3), 506/34 and POCSO Sections 4 and 6. Court expressed disinclination to grant bail; applicant sought permission to withdraw the application, which was disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-NAG:3239
(1) 23.ba.1052.2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (BA) NO. 1052 OF 2023
Pravin s/o Bisan Dahare Vs.
State of Maharashtra, Through Police Station Veltur, District Nagpur and another
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Mr. S. K. Bhandarkar, Advocate for applicant.
Ms. Swati Kolhe, APP for respondent No.1/State.
Ms. J. A. Deshpande, appointed Advocate for respondent No.2.
CORAM : URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J. DATED : 13 /03/2024
(URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.)
Sarkate
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Pravin s/o Bisan Dahare
State of Maharashtra, Through Police Station Veltur, District Nagpur
respondent No.2
Urmila Joshi-Phalke
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
