Ranjit Fulchand Gautam v. State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
The court notes the applicant has already been released on bail by a previous order, rendering the pending bail application infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1 2 BA 1024-23.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1024 OF 2023
.. Ranjit Fulchand Gautam Applicant Versus
State of Maharashtra .. Respondent …
Mr.Prasad B. Kulkarni for the applicant. Smt. Mahalaxmi Ganpathy, APP for the State.
CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE, J. DATED : 6th MAY, 2024
P.C:-
1 Since it is informed by the learned APP that the applicant is no longer incarcerated and has been released on bail by an order passed by this Court, on 23/10/2023, Criminal Bail Application No.2331/2023, has been rendered infructuous.
( SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.)
Tilak
Ranjit Fulchand Gautam
State of Maharashtra
Bharati Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court