An arbitration petition dismissed for want of prosecution as neither the petitioner nor the respondent appeared on two consecutive hearing dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1 25 ARP-75-2022 .doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO.75 OF 2022
M/s. Saikrupa Constructions Thr. Partner, Shri Shivaji Dagadu Mote
.. Petitioner
Versus
Union of India, Thr. Government Pleader And Ors.
.. Respondents
None for the petitioner. None for the respondents.
CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE, J. DATED : 9th JANUARY 2024
P.C:-
On 20/09/2023, there was no appearance on behalf of the petitioner and even today neither the petitioner nor the respondent are represented, hence the arbitration petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
( SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.)
Ashish
M/s. Saikrupa Constructions Thr. Partner, Shri Shivaji Dagadu Mote
Union of India, Thr. Government Pleader And Ors.
Bharati Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
