Arbitration petition withdrawn after the respondent pointed to a clause fixing the place of arbitration as New Delhi; petitioner was granted liberty to invoke jurisdiction of the competent court.
Petition withdrawn with liberty to invoke jurisdiction of competent court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
MANDIRA MILIND Digitally signed by MANDIRAMILIND SALGAONKAR SALGAONKAR Date: 2024.04.30 00:44:29+0530
1/2 33 arp-161-23 (25-4).odt
E-fle i
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ARBITRATION PETITION NO.161 OF 2023
M/s Vishal Sagar Home & Agro Products Ltd. Through Director Vishal Chandrakhant Kele
.. Petitioner
Versus
M/s Tata Power Solar Systems Ltd. .. Respondent
Mr.Atul Damle, Senior Counsel with Payal Vardhan i/b Nitesh Mohite for the Petitioner.
Mr.Jatin Pore with Vishal Mandal i/b DSK Legal for the Respondent.
CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE, J. DATED : 26th APRIL, 2024
P.C:-
M.M.Salgaonkar
2/2 33 arp-161-23 (25-4).odt
( SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.)
M.M.Salgaonkar
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the arbitration petition could proceed given an arbitration clause specifying New Delhi as the seat of arbitration.
M/s Vishal Sagar Home & Agro Products Ltd. Through Director Vishal Chandrakhant Kele
M/s Tata Power Solar Systems Ltd.
Bharati Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
