Applicant and Respondent No. 2 filed a joint pursis recording amicable out-of-court settlement of the dispute; the Court took the pursis on record and disposed of the criminal application in terms of it.
Application disposed in terms of joint pursis Exh. 'X'; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
930appln982-21
2024:BHC-AUG:25843
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
930 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 982 OF 2021
VIJAY LAXMANRAO DAHALE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
Mr. Sharad S. Shinde h/for Mr. Vivek V. Bhavthankar, Advocate for Applicant
Mr. N. D. Batule, APP for Respondent State
Mr. Madhav N. Kalyane h/for Mr. Avinash M. Reddy, Advocate for Respondent No.2
CORAM : Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J. Dated : 17th October, 2024
PER COURT :-
No. 2 Anand Jai Agrawal have filed joint pursis by which they have amicably settled the dispute out of Court. The said pursis is taken on record and marked as Exhibit 'X' for identification.
amicably settled the dispute out of Court, the present matter is disposed off in terms of joint pursis Exh.'X'. No order as to cost.
( Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J. )
Chavan
1 of 1
Vijay Laxmanrao Dahale
The State of Maharashtra
Anand Jai Agrawal
Y. G. Khobragade
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
