Applicant sought withdrawal of a criminal application as related quashing and writ proceedings were pending before the Division Bench. The court permitted withdrawal with liberty to file afresh.
Permission to withdraw the application with liberty to file afresh if circumstances arise.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
2024:BHC-NAG:13910
44.appln.91.22.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.91 OF 2022
(Naved s/o Sajid Ali Vs. The State of Maharashtra and ors.)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order
Mr. M.R. Joharapurkar, Advocate for the applicant. Ms S. Haider, APP for the State. Mr. A.S. Dhore, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 to 6.
CORAM:- URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J. DATED :- DECEMBER 14, 2024
Learned Counsel for the applicant, on instructions, submitted that the accused has already filed an application for quashing of the proceedings wherein to carry out the investigation is permitted; however, restrained the investigating authority to file the charge-sheet.
2
44.appln.91.22.odt
(URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.)
*Divya
Naved s/o Sajid Ali
The State of Maharashtra
Respondent Nos.2 to 6
Urmila Joshi-Phalke
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
