Gauri Prakash Patil v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Wife sought transfer of two matrimonial proceedings from JMFC Alibaug to Family Court Pune with clubbing for joint hearing, citing travel hardship and unpaid maintenance arrears. Judge relied on a Supreme Court precedent, found the case arguable, issued notice to the private respondent and deferred proceedings below.
What the court decided
4-APPLN-470-2024.doc
Prasad Rajput (P.A.)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 470 OF 2024
- Gauri Prakash Patil .. Applicant Versus
- State of Maharashtra and Anr. .. Respondents
Versus
State of Maharashtra and Anr.
- Ms. Swapna Kode, appointed Advocate for Applicant.
- Ms. Sangeeta E. Phad, APP for the State.
CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : DECEMBER 18, 2024
P.C.:
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Should the matrimonial proceedings before JMFC Alibaug be transferred and clubbed at Family Court Pune for the Applicant-wife's convenience?
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Gauri Prakash Patil
- respondent
State of Maharashtra
- respondent
Respondent No.2 (Private Respondent)
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
12 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Pidilite Industries Limited, Thr. Its. Atho. Representative Shri. Asheesh Gupta vs M/S Ezzy Hardware, Thr. Its Prop. Shri. Khuzema Rasoolbhai Hakimi
Smt.Sulekha Bal Parab and Ors. vs Maharashtra State Road Transport Corpn. Thr. Its Sectretary
Icici Lombard General Insurance Company Mumbai vs Sangita Mahadev Patil and Anr.
Vishal Vinod Goswami vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.