Criminal application disposed of as withdrawn against applicant No. 5. Notice issued to respondent No. 2, which respondent No. 1 waved.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
904-appln-3371-2024.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
904 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3371 OF 2024
PRIYANKA W/O SURESH JADHAV AND OTHERS VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
Mr. Mahesh P. Kale, Advocate for Applicants. Mrs. P. R. Bharaswadkar, APP for Respondent No.1/State.
CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI & R. W. JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : 29 NOVEMBER 2024
ORDER :
. After hearing learned Advocate for the applicants, when disinclination is shown to grant any relief in favour of applicant No.5, learned Advocate for the applicants, on instructions, seeks withdrawal of the application as against applicant No.5. Hence, application stands disposed of as withdrawn as against applicant No.5.
[ R. W. JOSHI ] [ SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI ] JUDGE JUDGE
scm
[1]
Priyanka W/o Suresh Jadhav and Others
The State of Maharashtra
Another
Vibha Kankanwadi
R. W. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
