The High Court, Bench at Aurangabad, allowed an application for condonation of delay of 97 days in filing a criminal appeal. The court held that the reasons provided were valid and the delay was unintentional.
Delay of 97 days is condoned; application is allowed and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:12082
-1-
932-APPLN.1960.2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
932 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1960 OF 2024 IN APEALST/5246/2024
KRIPANSINGH HATYARSINGH TAK
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. D. S. Patil h/f Mr. S. S. Gangakhedkar APP for Respondent - State : Mrs. Chaitali Chaudhari - Kutti
CORAM : ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J. DATED : 27th JUNE, 2024
PER COURT :
-2932-APPLN.1960.2024
State.
(ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J.)
Tandale
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay of 97 days in filing the criminal appeal requires condonation.
Whether the application for condonation of delay is maintainable.
KRIPANSINGH HATYARSINGH TAK
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
ABHAY S. WAGHWASE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
