Application for condonation of delay in challenging the order of conviction. The High Court condoned the delay and allowed the application.
Condonation of delay in challenging the order of conviction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 926 appa 952.24
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
CIVIL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPA) NO. 952/2024 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL (ST) NO. 6330/2024
(Dhanraj Pralhad Sathe Vs. State of Maharashtra)
Mr. P.V. Saliokar, Advocate h/f Mr. U.J. Deshpande, Advocate for applicant.
Mrs. N. Tripati, APP for non-applicant/state
CORAM: VINAY JOSHI AND MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ.
DATED : 04/10/2024.
Heard.
CRIMINAL APPEAL (ST) NO. 6330/2024
2 926 appa 952.24
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPA) /2024
( MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) (VINAY JOSHI, J.)
Gohane
Dhanraj Pralhad Sathe
State of Maharashtra
VINAY JOSHI
VRUSHALI V. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court