Allowed

Gajanan S/O Mohan Bhawar v. the State of Maharashtra Thr. Pso Ps Mehkar Dist.Buldhana

Bombay HC26 Mar 2024APPA/330/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Applicants convicted under Sections 353/332/34 IPC sought suspension of sentence and bail pending appeal. The Court suspended the sentence until the disposal of the appeal and granted bail upon execution of personal bonds with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Execution of sentence suspended; appellants released on bail executing PR bonds in sum of Rs.15,000/- each with one solvent surety.

Gajanan S/O Mohan Bhawar Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr. Pso… — Bail and Remand | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

2024:BHC-NAG:3677

¶2

(1) 25.appa.330.2024

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

¶4

CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPA) NO.330 OF 2024 IN

¶5

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.172 OF 2024

¶6

Gajanan s/o Mohan Bhawar and another

¶7

Vs.

¶8

State of Maharashtra, Through Police Station Officer, Police Station, Mehkar, District Buldana

¶9

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders

¶10

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mr. S. B. Gandhe, Advocate for appellant. Mr. U. R. Phasate, APP for respondent/State.

¶11

CORAM : URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J. DATED : 26/03/2024

¶12

By this application, appellants are seeking suspension of sentence and releasing them on bail.

¶13

The appellants were prosecuted for the offences punishable under Sections 353 and 332 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment of six months and to pay fine of Rs.5,000/- each for the offence punishable under Section 353 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and also convicted for the offence punishable under Section 332 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment of six months and to pay fine of Rs.5,000/-.

¶14

(2) 25.appa.330.2024

¶15

Learned Counsel for the appellants submitted that the appellants have every chance of success in the present appeal. Moreover, the sentence is of limited period. The appeal would take its own time for its final decision. In the meantime, if the sentence is executed, the appeal would become infructuous.

¶16

Learned APP strongly objected the application on the ground that appeal is devoid of merits.

¶17

After hearing both the sides and after perusal of the impugned judgment and submissions made out by the learned Counsel for the appellants, who has pointed out that he has every chance of success, as he has many arguable points in the present appeal. The punishment imposed is also for a limited period. In view of that, the execution of sentence deserves to be suspended. Accordingly, I proceed to pass following order.

¶18

ORDER

¶19

(i) The execution of the sentence passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.6/2021 is suspended till disposal of the appeal.

¶20

(ii) The appellant No.(1) Gajanan s/o Mohan Bhawar and No.(2) Rahul s/o Kunaji Jadhav be released on bail on executing PR bond in the sum of Rs.15,000/-

¶21

(3) 25.appa.330.2024

¶22

each with one solvent surety in the like amount.

¶23

The Criminal Application (APPA) No.330/2024 is disposed of.

¶24

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.172 OF 2024

¶25

(i) Heard. (ii) Admit . (iii) Learned APP waives service of notice for the State. (iv) Call for record and proceedings. (v) The appeal be placed before the Court after preparation of the paper book.

¶26

(URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.)

¶27

Sarkate

Gajanan S/O Mohan Bhawar v. the State of Maharashtra Thr. Pso Ps Mehkar Dist.Buldhana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gajanan S/O Mohan Bhawar v. the State of Maharashtra Thr. Pso Ps Mehkar Dist.Buldhana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vishwajit @ Papu S/O Vinod Thombre Vs State of Mah. Thr. Pso Ps Civil Line Akola Tq. and Dist.Akola

Akash Govinda Agaldare vs State of Mah. Thr. Pso, Manora Ps, Manora, Dist. Washim.

Pratik S/O. Vinod Chincholkar vs State of Mah. Thr. Pso, Ps Khamgaon Rural, Tq. Khamgaon, Dist. Buldhana and Another..

Ravindra Radhakisan Kasat Vs Sachin Santosh Gojane

Shyam S/O Manohar Kundwani. Vs the State of Mah. Thr. Pso Tumsar Dist. Bhandara and Another

Vrushali Krushi Kendra Hiwarkhked Thr. Its Proprietor Digambar S/O Motiram Tohare Vs Gopal Alias Shrikant S/O Gyandev Sapkal