The appellant sought permission to withdraw the appeal. The court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn, noting that the interim application was disposed of as it did not survive the dismissal of the main appeal.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
905-APP.62.2024
Jvs.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL NO. 62 OF 2024 IN INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1108 OF 2023 WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 29600 OF 2023
JAYANT VISHWANATH SALUNKE
Digitally signed by JAYANT VISHWANATH SALUNKE Date: 2024.03.15 10:32:28 +0530
Kutubddin w/o Abbasbhai Tambawala } Appellant versus
M/s. Commercial Developers } Respondent
Mr. Aziz Mohammed for appellant.
CORAM: DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ. & ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.
DATE: 14th MARCH 2024
P.C.:
1. Mr. Aziz Mohammed, learned counsel for the Appellant, on the basis of instructions, states that the Appellant may be permitted to withdraw the appeal.
2. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
3. Notwithstanding withdrawal of this appeal, it will always open to the Appellant to avail legal remedy which may be available to the Appellant in law.
4. In light of the dismissal of the appeal, the interim application does not survive and stands disposed of as such.
(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)
1
Kutubddin w/o Abbasbhai Tambawala
M/s. Commercial Developers
DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA
ARIF S. DOCTOR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
