Vasant Suresh Solanki v. Vianney Regie Dsouza and Anr.
Bombay HCAPL/884/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
This is a procedural order listing the matter before the appropriate Single Judge Bench as the remedy lies there, rather than exercising appellate jurisdiction.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
21-APL-884-24.odt
¶2
1 / 1
¶3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
¶4
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.884 OF 2024
¶5
Vasant Suresh Solanki
¶6
.... Applicant
¶7
versus
¶8
Vianney Regie D’Souza & Anr. .... Respondents
¶9
- Mr. R. V. Gupta, Advocate for Applicant
¶10
- Mr. Ajay Patil, APP for the State/Respondent.
¶11
CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL & DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ. DATE : 11th OCTOBER, 2024
¶12
P.C. :
¶13
- Learned counsel for the Applicant states that he is challenging two orders passed by the Trial Court and the Revisional Court. According to him, therefore, the remedy lies before the Single Judge Bench of this Court.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Vasant Suresh Solanki
- respondent
Vianney Regie D’Souza & Anr.
Coram
AI extract
Sarang V. Kotwal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
5 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court