The High Court at Nagpur discharged an applicant in a criminal application. The court heard counsel who relied on a Supreme Court decision. The parties waived notice, which was made returnable on a future date without a substantive disposal of the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 apl.878.24
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO.878/2024
Virendrasing S/o. Vijaysing Sisodiya
Vs.
State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Mr. S. A Mohta, Advocate for Applicant. Ms. K. Marpakwar, A.P.P. for Non-applicant/State.
CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI & MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 01/07/2024.
. Heard the learned Advocate for the applicant. He relies on the decision in Ram Nath Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Others [(2024) 3 SCC 502 .
(MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) (SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J.)
RGurnule Signed by: Mrs. R.M. MANDADE Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 02/07/2024 11:24:00
1 issue framed by the court
Whether notice to the State is required considering the State's waiver.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Ram Nath Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and OthersFollowed¶11
Ram Nath Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Others [(2024) 3 SCC 502 · Who else cites this
Virendrasing S/o. Vijaysing Sisodiya
State of Maharashtra
Vibha Kankanwadi
Vrushali V. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
