In a criminal application challenging an FIR registration, the High Court directed issue of notice and restrained coercive action against the applicant pending final disposal.
Issue notice to Respondent No.2; restraining coercive action against the applicant in the meantime.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
39-APL-184-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 184 OF 2024
Rajan Pradeepkumar Dubey ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents
Mr. Abhishek Kulkarni a/w Mr. Sagar W., Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. Anand S. Shalgaonkar, APP for the Respondent – State.
CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, & N. R. BORKAR, JJ. DATE : 18th MARCH, 2024.
P.C.:
(N. R. BORKAR, J.)
(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)
Digitally signed by SAJAKALI SAJAKALILIYAKAT LIYAKATJAMADARDate: Sajakali Jamadar JAMADAR 2024.03.1919:55:31 +0530
1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether notice should be issued in a criminal application challenging the registration of an FIR under Section 295(A) IPC.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rajan Pradeepkumar Dubey
The State of Maharashtra
Respondent No.2
Prakash D. Naik
N. R. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
