Allowed

Dr. (Mrs) Sharda Anand Kate v. the State of Maharashtra Thr. Pso, Ps, Sitabuldi, Nagpur City, Variety Square, Sitabuldi, Nagpur

Bombay HC23 Sept 2024APL/1261/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Nursing home owner sought quashing of prosecution for negligent acts causing ceiling collapse and water seepage endangering neighbouring cooperative society employees. Parties settled amicably; informant consented. High Court invoked inherent jurisdiction and quashed the criminal case on payment of costs.

What did the court decide?

Criminal prosecution (Summary Criminal Case No.25115/2018) quashed and set aside; applicant to deposit Rs.15,000 with Library, HC Bar Association, Nagpur within one week.

Dr. (Mrs) Sharda Anand Kate Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr… — Quashing and FIR | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

2024:BHC-NAG:10686-DB

apl1261.24

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY : NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.

¶6

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1261 OF 2024.

¶7

Dr.[Mrs] Sharda Anand Kate, Aged 61 years, Occupation – Medical Practitioner, Kate Maternity and Nursing Home, 2^nd Floor, Nanaji Shastri Marg, Near Batukbhai Jewellers Dharampeth, Nagpur 440012. ... APPLICANT.

¶8

VERSUS

¶9

1.The State of Maharashtra, through Police Station Officer, Police Station Sitabuldi, Nagpur City, Variety Square, Sitabuldi, Nagpur.

¶10

2.The Dharampeth Mahila Multi State Cooperative Society, Nagpur through its Chief Officer, Legal Department, First Floor, Nanaji Shastri Marg, Near Batukbhai Jewellers Dharampeth, Nagpur 440012. .. NON-APPLICANTS.

¶11

Mr. B.G. Kulkarni, Advocate for the Applicant. Ms M.H. Deshmukh, A.P.P. for Non-applicant No.1- State. Mr. H. Dangre, Advocate for Non-applicant No.2.

Rgd.

apl1261.24

Judgment

CORAM : VINAY JOSHI AND VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ.

¶17

DATE : SEPTEMBER 23, 2024.

¶18

ORAL JUDGMENT (PER VINAY JOSHI, J.) :

¶19

Heard.

¶20

Admit . By consent of the learned Counsel for the parties, the matters are taken up for final disposal.

¶21

This is an application seeking to quash the criminal prosecution bearing Summary Criminal Case No.25115/2018 pending on the file of 2^nd Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Nagpur arising out of first information report bearing Crime No.62/201823 registered with Sitabuldi Police Station, Nagpur for the offence punishable under Sections 336, 270 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code, on account of settlement.

¶22

The informant is working as a Legal Manager with

Rgd.

Judgment

apl1261.24

Dharampeth Mahila Multi State Cooperative Society, Nagpur. The society is situated on first floor, whilst on the upper floor the applicant is running a Maternity and Nursing Home. It was noticed that for non-maintenance and negligent act of the applicant, there was water seepage from the drainage line on the first floor, which was vulnerable to spread infectious disease and pose danger to the inhabitants of first floor. On 14.02.2018, in the evening due to seepage, back portion of the ceiling fell down, however, fortunately no one was injured. Since the safety of the employees of the society was at risk, the informant in the capacity of head of the legal department has lodged the report. The police have investigated the matter and on completion, filed charge sheet. It is informed that yet evidence has not been recorded.

¶28

In the meantime, parties have amicably settled the dispute. The parties have filed a joint Pursis to that effect. The informant has also tendered an authority letter of the Vice President of the Cooperative Society authorizing her to appear and settle the matter before this Court. The informant is present before us and is identified by her Advocate. She has informed about the settlement and gave no

Rgd.

Judgment

apl1261.24

objection to quash the prosecution. She has also stated that since the situation has been remedied by the applicant, and to further the cordial relations, matter has been settled.

¶34

The learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the applicant is ready and willing to deposit an amount of Rs.15,000/towards costs for rotating the police machinery.

¶35

Having regard to the nature of accusation and the parties occupying the premises in the same tenement, we deem it appropriate to invoke our inherent jurisdiction. In view of above, we proceed to pass the following order.

¶36

ORDER

¶37

(i) Criminal Application is allowed and disposed of.

¶38

(ii) The criminal prosecution bearing Summary Criminal Case No.25115/2018 pending on the file of 2^nd Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Nagpur arising out of first information report bearing Crime No.62/201823

Rgd.

Judgment

apl1261.24

registered with Sitabuldi Police Station, Nagpur for the offence punishable under Sections 336, 270 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code is quashed and set aside.

¶44

(iii) The applicant shall deposit an amount of Rs.15,000/with the Library, High Court Bar Association, Nagpur, within a period of one week. The matter be listed for reporting compliance on 01.10.2024.

¶45

JUDGE J UDGE

¶46

Rgd.

Dr. (Mrs) Sharda Anand Kate v. the State of Maharashtra Thr. Pso, Ps, Sitabuldi, Nagpur City, Variety Square, Sitabuldi, Nagpur

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr. (Mrs) Sharda Anand Kate v. the State of Maharashtra Thr. Pso, Ps, Sitabuldi, Nagpur City, Variety Square, Sitabuldi, Nagpur

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bablu S/O Dhanraj Bagde Vs the State of Maharashtra Pso Ps Sadar Dist.Nagpur and Another

Kisna S/O Namdev Mundre Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr. Home Dept.,(Spel),Mantralaya,Madam Kama Road, Mumbai and 2 Another

Vijay Narayan Rathod Vs Special Police Inspector General Prison East Region Nagpur and Anothe

The Deputy Chief Engineer, Central Railway Division, Ajani, Nagpur Vs Pramod Jagdish Tiwari and Others

Samir S/O Dilip Kumare and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Police Station Office, Police Station Chamorshi, Dist. Gadchiroli

The Deputy Chief Engineer, Central Railway Division, Ajani, Nagpur Vs Shri.Jagdamba Devi and Shri Shankarji Devasthan,Yavatmal Thr. Kulbhushan Gokulprasad Tiwari and Ors.