Disposed

Ramchandra Ajinath Bhosale v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Bombay HC1 Apr 2024APEAL/936/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Appellant had been granted protection from arrest in a case under Section 324 IPC where no castiest abuses were attributed to him. With the State confirming the charge sheet was ready and custody unnecessary, the court made the interim protection order absolute.

What did the court decide?

Interim order dated 28.08.2023 granting protection from arrest made absolute; appellant bound by clauses (c) and (d) to cooperate with the Investigating Officer.

Ramchandra Ajinath Bhosale Vs State of Maharashtra and Anr. — Caste Atrocities | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

(1)Apeal-936-2023.doc

¶2

rajshree

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.936 OF 2023

¶5

Ramchandra s/o Ajinath Bhosale ] .. Appellant vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ] .. Respondents

¶6

Mr.Onkar Arun Mane, for the Appellant. Ms.Mahalaxmi Ganpati, APP for the State. PSI Akash Bhingardeve, Mohol Police Station present. Mr.Sujeet R. Bugade, Respondent no.2 present.

¶7

CORAM : BHARATI DANGRE, J

¶8

DATE : 1^st April, 2024.

¶9

P.C.

¶10

Digitally signed by RAJSHREE RAJSHREE KISHOR KISHOR MORE MORE Date: 2024.04.01 18:48:15 +0530

¶11

1] By order dated 28.08.2023, the Appellant was admitted to protection from arrest, by recording that charge sheet was filed under Section 324 of the IPC and reading of the complaint did not lead to any castiest abuses being hurled by the present Appellant.

¶12

The learned APP make a specific statement that the charge sheet is ready to be filed against the present Appellant and she has instructions to make a statement that custodial interrogation of the Appellant is not necessary.

¶13

1/2

¶14

(1)Apeal-936-2023.doc

¶15

2] The learned counsel representing the complainant has invited my attention to a complaint made to the Director General of Police, Maharashtra State, about not carrying out investigation in a proper manner and it is informed that the said Application is pending, being made on 19.10.2023.

¶16

3] Needless to state that every complainant has right to get justice, but he could not determine the direction of the investigation. When the Investigating Officer do not desire the custody of the Appellant and since prima facie as far as hurling of abuses in the name of the caste are concerned, they are not attributed to the Appellant, the order dated 28.08.2023 is made absolute.

¶17

Needless to state that the Appellant shall be bound by clause (c) and (d) of the order and shall render all his co-operation to the Investigating Officer in filing the charge sheet.

¶18

[BHARATI DANGRE, J]

¶19

2/2

Ramchandra Ajinath Bhosale v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramchandra Ajinath Bhosale v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Foxymorom Media Solutions Private Limited vs Workamp Spaces Private Limited

Mumbai Shahar Berojgar Seva Sahakari Sanstha Federation Limited vs Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (Mcgm)

Sanjusha Khan and Anr. vs Sajid Khan and 5 Ors.

The Jeevan Sarita Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd. vs Arkade Developers Pvt. Ltd.

M/S. Watergrace Products through Its Proprietor vs the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and Ors.

Ramchandra Ajinath Bhosale Vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.