Appellant sought leave to withdraw a criminal appeal with liberty to re-apply if the trial did not proceed substantially. The Court granted leave, allowed the withdrawal of the appeal, and disposed of the matter accordingly.
Leave to withdraw appeal granted with liberty to re-apply.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AS:12663
Darshan Patil 909.apeal.619-23.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.619 OF 2023
SATISH VIJAY SHEVALE ..APPELLANT VS. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR. ..RESPONDENTS
Adv. Sanjeev Kadam a/w Adv. Mayur G. Sanap a/w Adv. Varsha Thorat for the appellant.
Smt. Sangeeta D. Shinde, APP for the State.
Adv. Lakshmi Raman for respondent No.2.
CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J.
DATE : MARCH 15, 2024
P.C. :
1. Learned counsel for the appellant, on instructions,
seeks leave to withdraw the present appeal with liberty to apply after reasonable time, if the trial does not proceed substantially.
2. Leave as sought for is granted. The appeal is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed for and disposed of accordingly.
3. I appreciate the valuable assistance rendered by Advocate Lakshmi Raman who appeared on behalf of
1/2
Darshan Patil 909.apeal.619-23.doc
respondent No.2 in this proceeding. Her engagement may be regularized by the Maharashtra State Legal Services Authority.
(M. S. KARNIK, J.)
2/2
Signed by: Darshan Patil Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 15/03/2024 19:22:19
Satish Vijay Shevale
The State of Maharashtra
Respondent No.2
M. S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
