Disposed

Madhukar Pandurang Adling and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Bombay HC10 Apr 2024APEAL/377/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction, hearing Criminal Appeal No. 377 of 2024 for anticipatory bail, directed the State to issue notice by 02/05/2024 and granted interim bail protection to the appellants pending instructions.

What did the court decide?

Issue notice to respondent; grant interim bail; appellants to attend Investigating Officer and cooperate with investigation.

Madhukar Pandurang Adling and Anr. vs State of Maharashtra… — Caste Atrocities | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

Darshan Patil

¶2

911-apeal-377-24.docx

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 377 OF 2024

¶5

1] MADHUKAR PANDURANG ADLING

¶6

2] CHHAYA MADHUKAR ADLING ..APPELLANTS VS. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ..RESPONDENT

¶7

Adv. Prashant Hagare i/b Adv. Ujjwala S. Khomane for the Appellants.

¶8

Mr. S.H. Yadav, APP for the State.

¶9

CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J.

¶10

DATE : APRIL 10, 2024

¶11

P.C. :

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned APP for the State.

¶13

By this appeal, the appellants pray for anticipatory bail in connection with C.R. No. 70 of 2024 dated 11/02/2024 registered with Walchandnagar Police Station, Pune, for the offence punishable under Sections 323, 341, 504, 506 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1) (s), 3(2)(va) and 6 of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

¶14

1/3

¶15

911-apeal-377-24.docx

¶16

Darshan Patil

¶17

The allegation is that the appellants took up a quarrel with the complainant over some building construction materials which was loaded in a transport vehicle. When the transport vehicle was passing from near the house of the appellants, it is alleged that the appellants assaulted the complainant and abused her in the name of the caste. There is a complaint registered by these appellants against the present complainant on 17/01/2024. The relationship between the parties is strained. According to the learned counsel for the appellants the possibility of the complainant levelling false accusations can not be ruled out.

¶18

Issue notice to respondent No.2, returnable on 02/05/2024.

¶19

Learned APP to take instructions. In the meantime, the appellants need to be protected by an interim order.

¶20

In the event of arrest, the appellants shall be released on bail on their furnishing P.R. Bond of Rs.10,000/- each with one or more sureties in the like amount.

¶21

The appellants to attend the Investigating Officer on 15/04/2024 between 11.00 a.m. and 1.00 p.m. and

¶22

2/3

¶23

911-apeal-377-24.docx

¶24

Darshan Patil

¶25

thereafter, as and when called.

¶26

The appellants to cooperate with the investigation.

¶27

(M. S. KARNIK, J.)

¶28

3/3

¶29

Signed by: Darshan Patil Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 10/04/2024 20:05:40

Madhukar Pandurang Adling and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Madhukar Pandurang Adling and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Mahesh Ganpat Sapkal vs State of Maharashtra Thr. the Divisional Joint Registar Co. Op. Soceity Kolhapur Division and Ors.

Hanuman Jambhuldev Mahila Sahakari Dudh Vyavsaik Sanstha Maryadit Thr. Its Chairwomen vs the Joint Registrar Co. Operative Societies ( Dairy) Maha. State and Ors.

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. through Divisional Manager vs Jayashri Ramesh Deore and Ors.

Hiren Shamji Thakkar vs State of Maharashtra Throu. Presiding Officer Senior Citizen Tribunal and Anr.

Bhogawati Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Shahunagar Thr Trustee S.S. Patil vs Jaysing Gopalrao Jadhav Hujare and Ors.

Ranjitsinh Vishwanathrao Patil vs the Deputy Charity Commissioner Kolhapur Division and Anr.