Appeal against an order declining ad-interim mandatory relief to remove a respondent from a suit flat. Appellant did not press the appeal on assurance of expedited hearing of the Notice of Motion; appeal and interim application were disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
P.H. Jayani 501 AO634.2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 634 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 12291 OF 2024 IN
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 634 OF 2024
Kavita Bharat Mane Vs.
Bharat Ramchandra Mane and ors.
…. Appellant
…. Respondents
Mr. Anuj N. Narula a/w. Ms. Meena Bhatta i/b. Jhangiani Narula and Associates for the Appellant.
CORAM : SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J. DATED : 06th SEPTEMBER, 2024
P.C. :-
1/2
P.H. Jayani 501 AO634.2024.doc
decide the aforesaid Notice of Motion at the earliest, he would not press for this Appeal and the Appeal may be disposed of.
(ii) The trial Court is requested to hear and dispose of
the Draft Notice of Motion in S.C. Suit No.1968 of 2023 expeditiously, if possible without affecting the cases requiring expeditious hearing and disposal.
survive and stands disposed of.
PREETI HEERO JAYANI
(SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.)
Digitally signed by PREETI HEERO JAYANI Date: 2024.09.11 18:50:11 +0530
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Should the trial Court be directed to hear and decide the Draft Notice of Motion seeking ad-interim relief in S.C. Suit No.1968 of 2023 expeditiously?
Kavita Bharat Mane
Bharat Ramchandra Mane
Shyam C. Chandak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
