Appeal against the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai stood over to 13/6/2024 at counsel's request after partial argument; the interim order earlier granted was vacated.
A one-line adjournment order of the Bombay High Court (Vacation Court). After some argument, at the appellant's counsel's request the appeal from order was stood over to 13/6/2024, and the interim protection previously granted was vacated. The order decides nothing of general application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Diksha Rane 2. AO 411-24.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 411/2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.9242/2024 WITH APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 411/2024
VIRENDRA VALJI MARCHANT ..APPELLANT VS. THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI THR. G-SOUTH WARD ..RESPONDENT
Adv. Shobhit Shukla for the appellant.
Adv. Smita Tondwalkar a/w. Adv. Anand Khairnar for respondent-BMC.
CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.
DATE : JUNE 6, 2024. (VACATION COURT)
P.C. :
1. After the matter was argued for some time, on the request of learned counsel for the appellant, stand over to 13/6/2024 .
2. The interim order granted earlier is hereby vacated.
(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)
1
Signed by: Diksha Rane Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 07/06/2024 09:56:49
Virendra Valji Marchant
The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai thr. G-South Ward
Rajesh S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
