Single-judge order in a civil appeal concerning a challenge by Nutan Vidya Mandir against the MHADA regarding notice periods. The court issued notice, maintained status quo until the next date, and noted an argument regarding insufficient notice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SMITA Digitally signed by SMITA JOHNSON JOHNSON GONSALVESDate: 2024.04.15 GONSALVES 16:10:22 +0530
16.ao314-24.doc
sg
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.314 OF 2024
WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.7714 OF 2024 IN
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.314 OF 2024
Nutan Vidya Mandir
...Appellant/Applicant
vs.
The Chief Executive Officer, Maharashtra Housing And Area Development Authority ...Respondent
Mr Y.K. Tiwari, i/b. K.P. Tiwari & Co., for the Appellant.
Coram : R.N. Laddha, J.
Date : 15 April 2024
P.C. :
1 / 2
16.ao314-24.doc
notice should be given to all parties in every such matters. Till the next date, parties to maintain status-quo.
(R.N. LADDHA, J.)
2 / 2
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Writ Petition No.3973 of 2023Referred¶19
Nutan Vidya Mandir
The Chief Executive Officer, Maharashtra Housing And Area Development Authority
R.N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
