Appellants questioned the rejection of their cross-objection filed to support an impugned judgment in an inventory suit appeal. The High Court held a cross-objection must question findings or seek additional relief, and dismissed the appeal, permitting written submissions instead.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
AO 31 of 2023
Meena
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.31 OF 2023
VICTOR SANTAN DCUNHA (SINCE DEC THR LRS) AND 2 ORS ... APPELLANTS Versus FRANCIS MANUEL DCUNHA AND 8 ORS ... RESPONDENTS
Party in person present.
CORAM:- AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J. DATED :- 7th March, 2024
P.C.:
Page 1 of 2
7th March, 2024
AO 31 of 2023
AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.
Page 2 of 2
7th March, 2024
1 issue framed by the court
Can a cross-objection under Order 41 Rule 22 CPC be filed merely to support the judgment below without questioning any finding?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Victor Santan Dcunha (since deceased thr Lrs) and 2 ors
Francis Manuel Dcunha and 8 ors
Avinash G. Gharote
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
