Rangnath Dnyandev Pathare and Another v. the State of Maharashtra and Another
Bombay HCABA/982/2025
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
¶2
CORAM : ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J. DATE : 16 JULY 2025
¶3
P. C. :-
¶4
- Matters listed below are not on Board. Upon Mentioning, taken on Board for continuation of interim relief.
¶5
- These matters are adjourned to the dates mentioned against them.
¶6
- The interim relief/undertaking/statement, if any, to continue till adjourned date of hearing.
¶7
- Liberty is granted to mention matter in case of urgency.
¶8
| Matter Number | Appearance | Next Date |
|---|---|---|
| Criminal Revision Application No. 38 of 2024 |
Mr. K. R. Doke, Advocate for Applicant Mr. S. B. Narwade, APP for State |
30 July 2025 |
| Criminal Revision Application No. 305 of 2024 |
Mr. S. D. Jaybhar, Advocate for Applicant Mr. M. K. Goyanka, APP for State |
30 July 2025 |
| Anticipatory Bail Application No. 813 of 2025 |
Mr. P. P. More, Advocate for Applicant Mrs. M. L. Sangit, APP for State |
30 July 2025 |
| Anticipatory Bail Application No. 866 of 2025 |
Mr. G. R. Syed, Advocate for Applicant Mr. S. B. Narwade, APP for State |
30 July 2025 |
| Anticipatory Bail Application No. 831 of 2025 |
Mr. G. R. Syed, Advocate for Applicant Mr. M. K. Goyanka, APP for State |
30 July 2025 |
| Anticipatory Bail Application No. 982 of 2025 |
Mr. V. R. Gandhi, Advocate for Applicants Mrs. M. L. Sangit, APP for State |
30 July 2025 |
| Anticipatory Bail Application No. 892 of 2025 |
Mr. Mohammed Aamir, Advocate for Applicant Mr. M. K. Goyanka, APP for State |
30 July 2025 |
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court