Sameer Raghunathrao Dandge v. the State of Maharashtra and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Speaking-to-minutes order in anticipatory bail applications. The court directed that the name of advocate Mr. H.V. Patil be shown for the original complainant as advocate assisting APP in all matters and that the corrected order be uploaded.
What the court decided
2024:BHC-AUG:28916 This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated //
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 931 OF 2024
WITH
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 932 OF 2024 WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 999 OF 2024 WITH
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1054 OF 2024
SAMEER RAGHUNATHRAO DANDGE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
Advocate for respective Applicants : Mr. N.S. Ghanekar, Mr. Y.H. Lagad, Mr. D.R. Kale
APP for Respondent/State : Mr. A.A.A. Khan Advocate for assisting APP in all matters : Mr. Hanmant V. Patil
- CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. DATE : 13.12.2024
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Sameer Raghunathrao Dandge
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
Arun R. Pedneker
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court