Anticipatory bail application dismissed for non-prosecution when the applicant failed to appear before the High Court despite the matter being scheduled for dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Mamta Kale
907-aba-898-2020.doc
MAMTA AMAR KALE Digitally signed byMAMTA AMAR KALEDate: 2024.03.0814:29:35 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRI. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 898 OF 2020
Vijay Chandra Tanneeru ..Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent
None for the Applicant.
Mr. Ashok Gawai, APP for the Respondent – State. API Kendre Rajkumar, Chaturshrwngi Police Station, Pune City present.
CORAM : R. N. LADDHA, J. DATE : 8 MARCH 2024
P.C.
. This application is filed seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with C.R. No.1313/2020 registered at Chaturshrwngi Police Station, Pune for the offences punishable under Section 406 and 420 of Indian Penal Code.
R. N. LADDHA, J.
page 1 of 1
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Vijay Chandra Tanneeru
The State of Maharashtra
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
