Two anticipatory bail applications in a crime under Sections 409 and 34 IPC. After hearing counsel and perusing the investigation papers, the court showed disinclination to grant bail; the applicants sought and were permitted to withdraw both applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
20aba739.2024+1.odt
1
2024:BHC-NAG:13158
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (ABA) NO. 739 OF 2024
Jaipal s/o Laxman Kushram Vs State of Maharashtra
WITH
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (ABA) NO. 747 OF 2024
Durwas s/o Krushnarao Raut Vs State of Maharashtra
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order
Mr. A.M. Chandekar, counsel for applicants in both the applications.
Ms. T.H. Udeshi, APP for non-applicant/State (ABA No.739/2024)
Mr. Nitin Autkar, APP for non-applicant/State (ABA No. 747/2024)
CORAM : URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J. DATED : 02/12/2024.
rkn
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Jaipal s/o Laxman Kushram
Durwas s/o Krushnarao Raut
State of Maharashtra
Urmila Joshi-Phalke
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
