Applicant sought anticipatory bail. Court, after reviewing investigation papers and hearing counsel, indicated disinclination to grant bail; the applicant then withdrew the application with permission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
2024:BHC-NAG:3386
05.aba.72.24.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (ABA) NO.72 OF 2024
(Mukesh s/o Kailash Joshi Vs. State of Maharashtra)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order
Mr. R.R. Deo, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. M.J. Khan, APP for the State.
CORAM:- URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J. DATED :- MARCH 20, 2024
The application is for grant of anticipatory
bail.
(URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.)
*Divya
Mukesh s/o Kailash Joshi
State of Maharashtra
Urmila Joshi-Phalke
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
