The applicant sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application after arguing on merits. The court granted permission to withdraw and dismissed the application as withdrawn.
Permission granted to withdraw the anticipatory bail application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:4825
1 948-ABA-55-24.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 55 OF 2024
AMOL @ PAVA S/O RAJENDRA SHEJWAL VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Mr. Angad L. Kanade, Advocate for Applicant Mr. N.B. Patil, APP for Respondents/State
CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.
DATE : 07th MARCH, 2024
PER COURT :
withdrawn.
(NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)
SVH
Amol @ Pava S/O Rajendra Shejwal
The State of Maharashtra
Nitin B. Suryawanshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
